Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOTChA chart
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GOTChA chart
- GOTChA chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
original research with no indication of notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. prod refund. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obvious WP:OR and poorly-written too. --JonathonSimister (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I had this article on my watchlist due to a request at WP:REFUND (though I don't think it had been deleted, just some content removed). At the time I assumed it was going to be expanded but it doesn't look like that will be the case. Protonk (talk) 09:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think they're selling something, but what's here is so meaningless it's hard to say: A GOTChA chart is a variation of a "quad chart" where a chart is divided into four quadrants: Goals Describe what you are trying to accomplish as simply as possible. Do not use jargon and try to tie the goals to that of a large project/program or effort to provide context.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as complete bollocks. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Was not able to find reliable sources about this subject. Folgertat (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.