Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GE – Good Ending
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
GE – Good Ending
- GE – Good Ending (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for reliable third-party sources only comes up with websites distributing illegal scanlations. Beyond the plot descriptions, the article fails WP:V, WP:NOTE, and WP:BK. The magazine or publisher of the series does not contribute anything towards the notability of the work. Nor does the author of the work appear to have any notability either. While the series does seem popular in scanlations, popularity is not the same as notability. Appears that it has not been licensed outside of Japan. —Farix (t | c) 12:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 12:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Userfy on me. No evidence of notability found. No licensor found in English, French, Spanish, Italian & German. No entry in the Anime News Network users edited encyclopedia. The scanlation is up to date & have some fandom support. For that reason i'm willing to have this article userfied in my user space. Prospect for licensing outside Japan is good. --KrebMarkt 15:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My searches find nothing but copyrvio scanlations and unreliable forum posts, and frankly not much of the latter, suggesting there's not much buzz for it. Can't prove it passes WP:BK = delete. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.