Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GET REAL!
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 02:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- GET REAL! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not pass the notability guideline for albums. It only includes a track listing, and all of the "references" are music videos from the track listing. None of the information in the infobox is actually sourced, and I couldn't find a source for it. TCN7JM 10:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe you won't delete it? This album is THE ONE, which made Math the band famous at all:) So I didn't create separate articles for other albums! Just for this one. For 13 songs were shot music videos. It's almost record. Only the album Elect the Dead by Serj Tankian has videos for every song). So, I think, this album shouldn't be deleted or redirected. I promise not to create articles about other albums by Math the band, but this one should be here. --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This will need more than just a tracklisting to remain as a standalone article. There are a few sources that could be used to expand it a little, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], but I'm not convinced that there's enough. Probably better to cover within the band article. --Michig (talk) 21:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- To Michig. Can you advice something instead of deletion or simple redirect? I have created similar articles, but they were calmly removed or redirected by other users (so article was empty just with redirect and all text was deleted). I'm just very sorry my work and efforts, which I spent to create this article and include the template, upload photo (albumcover), to find all the music videos on YouTube, and to insert references for them. So I'd like to find some "golden middle". --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 12:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The obvious alternative to deletion and redirection is a merge. There isn't much here other than a tracklist and links to YouTube videos - the former could be incorporated into a discography. I don't think the latter are really appropriate here. Since the article on the band is extremely short at present, expanding the prose there using the available sources would be best. --Michig (talk) 10:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've mixed the "Get Real!" with Math The Band and made redirect to "albums". Please, check it and tell me if you can leave the article in such state, as I've just done? With respect --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- To be honest, it doesn't look good. Content shouldn't be collapsed like that and there's no justification for a separate section and infobox just for a tracklisting, and the videos list is now duplicated for no apparent reason other than to get lots of youtube links into the article. --Michig (talk) 21:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a pity=( I thought the number of videos is almost record. Like Serj Tankian had shot videos for every song from his album) May be I'm wrong. If I add description for the music videos, will it help in this situation? --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not really. The article isn't supposed to be about the music videos, it's supposed to be providing sourced, notable information about the album itself. TCN7JM 17:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a pity=( I thought the number of videos is almost record. Like Serj Tankian had shot videos for every song from his album) May be I'm wrong. If I add description for the music videos, will it help in this situation? --ВікіПЕДист (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- To be honest, it doesn't look good. Content shouldn't be collapsed like that and there's no justification for a separate section and infobox just for a tracklisting, and the videos list is now duplicated for no apparent reason other than to get lots of youtube links into the article. --Michig (talk) 21:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 06:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Clear delete in its present form. Sourced entirely to the band's website and YouTube? Get real. --BDD (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.