Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gökdeniz Özcetin

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gökdeniz Özcetin

Gökdeniz Özcetin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Essentially an unsourced WP:BLP (save for some primary and non-WP:RS sources), and I am unable to find evidence that WP:GNG is met. Kinu t/c 23:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. This article should be deleted and then recreated if this subject meets our notability standards. --Salimfadhley (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Voiceacting does not confer the same notability as a real billing. No independent sources to be found. Agathoclea (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable yet. AAA3AAA (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.