Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion Power Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion Power Associates

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

dubious notability, no sources FASTILY 05:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article has no references of any kind and my own search turned up no significant independent coverage to show that WP:GNG is met. I also wonder about the notability of one of the founders, Stephen O. Dean, but that's a discussion for another time. Papaursa (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced, promotional and appears to fail WP:NCORP. Ajf773 (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per other editors --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep under WP:ORG. For consideration: [1][2][3][4] meet the requirement of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources. My opinion: it would be a travesty to delete a non-profit, scientific organization that has been active since 1979.@SmithAndTeam (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe any of the sources you mentioned signify notability. The first 3 are about people receiving awards from FPA which does nothing to show the company is notable. The final source mentions the company once and seems more like a passing mention. Papaursa (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.