Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furqan Shayk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furqan Shayk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks notability, most of the sources are unreliable and self published.... Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 08:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete part of the assertion of notability is "significant following on social media". The rest of the article explains that minor things that he did and that he no longer does them (e.g. mentions an "abrupt departure"), not encyclopedic in terms of notability. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Exceptionally ephemeral in even its claims. I could almost say no claims for notability, because vaguely saying one's vines were popular is. . . well . . . making one comparable to numberless unnamed owls, cats, and squirrels. Hithladaeus (talk) 19:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable enough as a Biography category on wikipedia Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 03:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.