Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frode Fjerdingstad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frode Fjerdingstad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just not notable, not much to elaborate beyond that notion. Geschichte (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After searching online, all I found were social media; no reviews, articles, book citations, etc. Does not pass GNG nor BASIC nor ARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable Devokewater@ 08:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there are no realible, in-depth, 3rd party indepdent secondary sources showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL, WP:GNG, and WP:CREATIVE. He's never exhibited in a Global city nor art colony, and he's had three books of between 100 and 2,000 copies.
Delete subject does not pass WP:BASIC Wm335td (talk) 02:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.