Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Bear
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted and redirected to List of Care Bears. (aeropagitica) (talk) 20:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually deleted an article with the same subject at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Bear (comic) without knowing that this other article existed. They're not copies of one another, and nor is it a recreation. But I already outlined the reasons for the nomination in the previous AFD, and I'll copy them here: The webcomic can be seen here, there is no Alexa rank, although the article claims that it served 20,000 unique visitors a month. Maybe that's true, but there's no external sources about the subject that I can find. That's probably because it is not a notable website or piece of work. - Hahnchen 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No google hits, the site's forum has only a couple hundred comments since 1999. A very persistent weird little page that has somehow managed to *not* become a web phenomenon and non-notable Dina 00:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 03:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per other AfD. I like the sample panel though. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Care Bears. Danny Lilithborne 03:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no Alexa rank, one Google result. Bradcis 04:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Danny. Powers T 14:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Care Bears, as per Danny Lilithborne's good insight! LinaMishima 16:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the history, then recreate as a redirect to List of Care Bears per Danny Lilithborne. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect per above. Erechtheus 02:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rediect Erechtheus: how can you delete and redirect? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You delete the article -- so that the current stuff isn't available in the history -- then recreate it as a redirect. In point of fact, after a delete, anyone would be free to create the redirect as a purely editorial decision; thus, it would be helpful if everybody specifying "redirect" would clarify if they really thought leaving the current article available in the history was a good idea. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, I specified "redirect"; leaving the history is not a problem for me. Powers T 23:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You delete the article -- so that the current stuff isn't available in the history -- then recreate it as a redirect. In point of fact, after a delete, anyone would be free to create the redirect as a purely editorial decision; thus, it would be helpful if everybody specifying "redirect" would clarify if they really thought leaving the current article available in the history was a good idea. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.