Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frente Civico
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Splash 16:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly written propaganda. It should be noted also that the author has defaced Costco and other oarticles in order to make a point about evil corporations. Title translates to civic front, not notable. Delete drini ☎ 00:19, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; not an article, just the symptoms of some argument or other. Flowerparty talk 00:50, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Weak keep as rewritten. Flowerparty talk 01:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (or Rewrite) The current article is definetely POV and unencyclopedic, however the orginization itself seems notable enough to have an article. Uber nemo 01:25, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, POV and not really notable or needed. In agreement with the above. -mysekurity 03:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I have rewriten the article to remove POV (pretty easy in this case). Its hard for me to judge notability, an english google search only turns up 556 articles [1], but a mutli-lingual search turns up a lot [2]. This might just be the use of the phrase "Frente Civico" and not reference to the group, I really don't know. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 19:57, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as rewritten. ESkog 21:02, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the rewritten version is useful. Nandesuka 22:08, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as rewritten. Punkmorten 16:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, they are a real group in Mexico, but the article is in need of cleanup. Karmafist 04:21, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.