Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/French Erotic Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

French Erotic Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable flash animation, fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:WEB. Several claims of notability but nothing to back them up. Elaragirl^Talk|Count 17:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No reliable sources, no article. Fails WP:V - badly. Moreschi 18:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NOTE. Maybe creator likes it, but it is not a sufficient reason for being listed on Wikipedia. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 19:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Was going to suggest a redirect, but apparently we don't have an article on French pornography, and Cinema of France doesn't cover the topic. So delete per above. Shimeru 20:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTE --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Merge with Animutation. This is supposed to be one of the most popular of this ilk (It's apparently part of some big "trilogy" about Colin Mochrie), but I don't think it deserves an article. Wavy G 02:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:WEB - merge possible, but if it's supposed to be part of a trilogy, you'd probably want all three parts there, right? SkierRMH 04:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps, but this is, as I am to believe, one of the most popular ones of this genre. It would be easy enough to find information about the other two, if necessary. Wavy G 08:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom-DESU 23:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Or at least give it a major rewrite, doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. Also not notable. ~ IICATSII punch the keys 10:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.