Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeciv

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 08:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Freeciv

Freeciv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could potentially be merged into the Civilization series article, or made part of a larger article on Civilization mods... or it could just as easily be deleted as there appear to be no sources beyond the primary kind. Coin945 (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Plenty of RS to estabilish notability:
pro-linux.de: [1] (1999), [2] (2013; version 2.4.0), [3] (2015; version 2.5.0), [4] (2017; news about 3D web version)
heise.de/iX: [5] (2015; FreeCiv and AI), [6] (2017; short news about 3D web version)
Linux Magazin: [7] (issue 10/2001; coverage in column by Georg C. F. Greve)
Amiga Future (coverage of the Amiga version): [8] (December 2000/January 2001 - issue 28, pp. 40-41), [9] (September/October 2002 - issue 38, pp. 46-47), (November/December 2002 - issue 39, pp. 23-25; play tips) Pavlor (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While this open-source software title is inspired by the original Civilization, it is an entirely different development. This freeware title is actually mentioned in that article. I think it is distinctive enough that this article should remain separate and not merged into the Civilization (series) article. Nutster (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep German Linux articles are enough Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.