Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeKareem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mideast Youth. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:13, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FreeKareem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization shows no evidence of significant coverage in secondary sources; the article's sources either discuss Kareem Amer without mentioning this organization, or come directly from the organization's own press releases. Sources I've found on my own appear to have only a single line mentioning that the website exists as part of the larger story about Amer. Even if more significant discussion of the FreeKareem website turns up, I'd suggest merging with the "Kareem Amer" article; this article's current form is essentially a duplication of the text at "Kareem Amer" anyway. Khazar2 (talk) 04:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect The group seems to be non-notable on its own, but it is described as a "project" of the organization Mideast Youth. I suggest the article be redirected to that group, per usual practice for subunits of notable organizations. I would also not object to a redirect to Kareem Amer.--MelanieN (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Either solution sounds good to me. Khazar2 (talk) 03:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.