Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frany Dejota

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is insufficient coverage available in reliable sources to show that the subject is notable at this time. Mz7 (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frany Dejota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by author without explanation. After searching for RSes, this fails GNG and MUSICBIO overall. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Amazon is not an reliable source. Could you please read WP:RS to explain we need independent third party sources? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Similar story at pt. Wkipedia [2] Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No one is saying it's promotional, it just has no indepth coverage in reliable sources and fails our notability guide and more pertinently WP:MUSICBIO Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Google News. Not one hit. ProQuest Music Periodicals Database - not one hit. ProQuest all databases - not one hit. Gale Canadian Periodical Index - no hits. Gale Infotrac Newsstand - no hits. I don't think I've ever encountered such an unnotable subject! Not only does there not appear to be anything to meet WP:GNG, I can't even find a reliable source that confirms they even exist! What the heck does "Verify" even mean? Based on it's usage here, it must mean that they don't know anything about Wikipedia's notability or deletion guidelines and policies. Nfitz (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Good sources are nonexistent, sources added are pretty bad, and the subject appears non-notable. CityOfSilver 19:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sources. But the deleting administrator will take note of the campaign here by numerous WP:SPA users. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frangaspar. Doug Weller talk 21:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      • Comment I've struck the posts from the confirmed socks, left Frangaspar's post and the IPs as the closing Admin/editor will likely see them as WP:DUCK editors, either socks or meatpuppets. Another sock was found after I blocked them for threatening an editor with the police, but the account didn't edit here. Doug Weller talk 09:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The librarian of Spain is in search and capture by the authorities of the police for suppressing pages of Frany Dejota. The persecution, harassment and deletion of pages in the Wikipedia of Spain that suffered the artist of this page was already denounced by the National Police and the Civil Guard the Librarian who ordered to delete the pages of the artist Frany Dejota.90.174.4.148 (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete totally unremarkable and non-notable "DJ" with absolutely no coverage in reliable sources. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
comment No one was saying he was a writer but it is possible to search in books for mentions of people. However, you're right, there's a total lack of coverage anywhere and Google Play is not an adequate source for establishing notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.