Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Perconte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States). Any pertinent information can be merged from the page history as long as proper attribution is maintained. Jujutacular (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Perconte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Frank Perconte was a soldier in E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) during World War II; his rank (technician fourth grade) and highest award (Bronze Star) make him non-notable under WP:SOLDIER. His post-war career as a postal worker earned him no significant coverage. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 20:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 20:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 20:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable; as with most all of the others. redirect name to E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States). Kierzek (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being in a company that received lots of coverage just does not make all its members notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Had a long obit in the Chicago Tribune, but never did anything notable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) and transclude/merge any pertinent info into there as needed. No justification for abrogation of NSOLDIER guidelines in this case. South Nashua (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.