Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Presidents Corners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. I no longer have concerns about the article, nor does anyone else. (non-admin closure) —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 11:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Four Presidents Corners

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a non-notable near recreation of Four Presidents Corners, Indiana, which was deleted after this AfD. This incarnation is about the point itself, whereas the previous article was about a purported village about the point. There aren't any secondary sources that give significant coverage I could find, and--on WP:TWL--there were just a few mentions of the Four Pres. Corners Historical Society. I also analyzed some of the sources at Talk:Four Presidents Corners. It's just not important enough to have received anything resempling in-depth coverage (and is far from meeting the applicable SNG WP:GEOFEAT). —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 18:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 18:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Draftify - My searches during the previous AfD didn't find any significant coverage of the monument, and the sources in the re-created article aren't impressive, but I'm willing to give the author a chance to improve it if they can find better sourcing. –dlthewave ☎ 05:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The expansion and additional sources are enough to justify an article. –dlthewave ☎ 17:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - References do not need to be impressive, but satisfactory for an article about the 'mixed' GEO:FEAT: quadripoint monument at the intersection to record its history. What's impressive is that while there are numerous tripoints and quadipoints in the USA, few are named and/or memorialized, which distingusihes it, as in seen in the very small Category:Quadripoints and higher of which 4PrezCorners is part. Djflem (talk) 07:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whilst trying to fix the link to the 2015 article, I did find [1], [2], and [3], all newspaper articles from the dedication of the monument. There's also this link to the 2015 Fort Wayne article that was not included in the article prior to today: Presidential timber. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 15:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
New refs inserted and article slightly expanded. Djflem (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The midwest United States needs monuments too. I love that this exists and is celebrated. Seriously though, seems to be enough sourcing to get by GNG in my view.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 16:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.