Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For This Cause (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For This Cause (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article fails to meet WP:NMUSIC and is not sufficiently supported by references from third party sources:

"Facebook, Purevolume, MySpace, Band Camp", all obviously self-published and also ambiguous
"iTunes", unreliable
~~"alternativemusichub" is a 404 - though I have found~~ The correct URL is merely a press release.
is an "Email from Google", unreliable
is a direct link to an image of one of their tour schedules.

Additionally, Google News returns nothing for "For This Cause" "Journeys", which (for me at least) is pretty indicitive that something has not received significant coverage in third-party media. Nik thestoned 15:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm finding mentions on social networking sites, non-notable blogs, and a couple press releases, but nothing I consider independent reliable sources. Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND at this time. Gongshow ^Talk 18:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot find significant coverage about this band in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the usual garage band stuff, but nothing that indicates that the band meets or is close to meeting any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.