Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foot health practitioner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Podiatry#United_Kingdom. Davewild (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foot health practitioner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this expired prod and thought it could use more views. Prod rationale was "Entirely unsourced article with no sign of sources for well over a year" - but, well, WP:NOEFFORT.

The article was created by has been extensively edited by an SPA who's made strange posts complaining about a conspiracy of podiatrists. The term appears to be used primarily in the UK and Ireland. Google does turn up apparent registries, professional associations, courses, etc., but it's unclear if this is actually notable despite the sorry state of the article, or just weird crankery. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or Merge with Podiatry#United_Kingdom. It appears this actually a profession and people can get a license to practice in it [1]. Obviously, I don't know the background of this and if the foot health practitioners (or this particular editor) have some kind of WP:FRINGE view that podiatry is a scheme or something. —Мандичка^YO 😜 06:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment from nominator - this popped back up on my watchlist due to the 'every AfD is about baseball' thing. I cleaned the article a little by reverting to a pre-SPA version. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as mentioned. This page discusses them together [2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge as per above - Personally it seems best suited to that article as opposed to being seperate. –Davey2010^Talk 20:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.