Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Focus FM (Ghana) (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Focus FM (Ghana) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a university campus radio station that lacks the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sources in the article all fail one or more of "significant, "independent", or "reliable". As of this version of the article the sources are:

  1. directory entry which is not significant coverage
  2. directory entry which is not significant coverage
  3. rawgist.com does not appear to be a reliable source (see other entries from the same site below)
  4. rawgist.com - appears to be a press release; compare with the radio stations's about page and so not independent
  5. rawgist.com - article about the radio station's journalists winnning awards including John Essien winning an award; the byline for this article is "John Essien" so clearly not independent
  6. ghanaweb.com - this is a presss release (see bootm stating "Send your news stories to newswires@ghanaweb.com") and so not independent
  7. focusfmknust.wordpress.com - the radio station's blog writing about themselve; clearly not independent
  8. rawgist.com - article is a passing mention so not signficant coverage
  9. internewsnetwork.com - a press release and an insubstantial one at that
  10. todaysprofile.com - The artile title is "Focus FM’s John Essien wins Outstanding Student Journalist at Maiden KNUST Eminence Awards" wiht a byline of "John Essien"; the source analysis writes itself

There is simply no coverage that would estalbish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Whpq (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.