Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flynn Blackie

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flynn Blackie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Behind the moors (talk) 07:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I just added in four new article references about him, to further enhance questions on passing WP:GNG. (talk) 14:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC+3)
  • Delete. Repeated use of SEO/black hat paid sources and other junk does not help. The rest seems to be fairly trivial. I don't see the awards as being particularly notable. Kuru (talk) 17:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Trivial and primary sourcing abounds, including in my due diligence. The awards don't work towards notability. WP:TOOSOON. Missvain (talk) 18:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.