Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flutrack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flutrack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article likely lacks significant independent coverage. It appears to share its name with a tool used to assist flu vaccination, and it has a similar name to another flu tracking program used in Australia and New Zealand, so many search results pertain to those two things. This article was created in December 2013 by an editor who has not done anything else and who shares a username with the developer's account on GitHub, which has the same real name as one of the authors of this article. This is the only article on PubMed about Flutrack and it was published three years after this article's creation, so I suspect that this article was created for promotional purposes by a Flutrack developer. Velayinosu (talk) 01:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Velayinosu (talk) 01:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Velayinosu (talk) 01:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the article on PubMed referenced above was written by the site's creators, so it isn't clearly independent. And my searches aren't finding anything else that could constitute significant coverage: everything is trivial single-sentence mentions. Barring something more, this fails the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.