Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florganoleptic

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Florganoleptic

Florganoleptic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a neologism (on weeeeed) and not a music genre as much as one man's project. Sourcing is unreliable, as it is mostly from youtube or a website called Music of the Plants. The artist himself might get an article but it appears too soon for that. Citing (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2021-08 ✍️ create
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the only RS availale is the Detrot Metro Times, and that's little more than a plug for the new weed laws, everything else is as the OP notes, WP:SPS and YouTube. No indication that it passes BASIC. ——Serial 20:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.