Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip Burger Boutique
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Flip Burger Boutique
- Flip Burger Boutique (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article as it is is a vehicle for promotion of the restaurant, featuring glowing reviews and still "press release" and marketing-type language. I do believe the restaurant may be notable due to its mention in multiple national media, however no one is stepping up to remove this promotional content, and this can't be allowed to remain on Wikipedia, unless we are ok with Wikipedia turning into a directory of press releases/promotional brochures Keizers (talk) 04:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - While it is overly promotional in tone, it is sourced from several reliable third party sources. It needs a cleanup, not a deletion. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Nominator suggests subject is notable, AfD is not for cleanup, articles like this abound yet we don't delete them. Hopefully, we improve them.--Milowent • hasspoken 04:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have done substantial gutting of the baloney in the article. The sourcing is pretty darn good, though, for notability.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to nom: Yeah, i see where you just gave just desserts (liquid nitrogen-ified i am sure) by adding the quote "Each burger tastes as if someone said, "Dude, let's figure out a way to cram a bunch of crap on one plate so the diner can't identify a single ingredient.", but we don't need to make it an attack article either. The mention re overdone is fair.--Milowent • hasspoken 19:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have done substantial gutting of the baloney in the article. The sourcing is pretty darn good, though, for notability.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:05, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notability is assured through a number of reliable sources. Milowent's cleanup has much improved the article. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.