Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Suffolk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems clear enough. Dennis - 2¢ 22:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Suffolk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't the "Flag of Suffolk". This is one man's rejected proposal for a flag. (I assume the author of this article is the one man in question, as the uploader of the image claims to be the copyright holder.) Even if the references weren't a pair of dead links, this would be a non-notable proposal, not a legitimate flag. (FWIW, Suffolk County Council and the Department for Communities and Local Government appear to think the flag of Suffolk is a completely different design. There's a possibility someone could write a legitimate article about the genuine flag, but it would have nothing in common with this article other than the title.) Mogism (talk) 21:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete This is why WP:N requires independent notice to be paid. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Andy Dingley, I can find no in depth coverage of this proposal, let alone independent in depth coverage. Thryduulf (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know what to add, nothing worth adding. Szzuk (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.