Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Foot Thick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five Foot Thick

Non notable band only claim to fame I can find and reason given by admin refusing speedy is that they were signed by Eclipse Records Cant find if they charted BigDunc^Talk 17:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn to me. I looked and didn't find any notable third party sources to justify this article's existence. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 01:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notability per WP:MUSIC#C5 for 2 albums on Eclipse Records. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have added a couple of citations for the existence of the mentioned albums. Think, that makes the article more notable. —KetanPanchal^taLK 22:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as well as the above, spots on the Vans Warped and Jagermeister tours passes WP:BAND criterion 4. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 23:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'm not convinced that Eclipse Records is a significant enough label for WP:MUSIC#C5 to apply. If touring means they pass WP:BAND#C4, that information should be included in the article as quickly as possible. Bondegezou (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep. It looks like its verifiable, (though not well referenced), and 3 studio albums and a warped tour is notable enough for me. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.