Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There appears to be a clear consensus that, with the addition of the new sources, the article should be kept. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 03:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fishdom

Fishdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references come from one website, the links to which are only accessible through Web Archive and appear to be press releases (see [1]). Other articles I found online are about Playrix as a company and only mention Fishdom tangentially. Since May 2020, there is a tag saying the article may have been the subject of undisclosed paid editing (diff [2]), but I cannot find any context for this. Overall, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nanophosis (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Nanophosis (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Nanophosis (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Playrix. Agree on the non-notable assessment of the game, but it is one of their larger titles and is thus a reasonable search term. --Masem (t) 15:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with the additional sources, but this still is borderline notability. --Masem (t) 21:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Merge as above. The context of upe editing is simple - it has been edited by blocked sockpuppets of blocked suspected undisclosed paid editors but you won't get any details as that would be outing, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Well, I have found coverage at AdWeek [3], Nintendo Life [4] and Gamezebo [5]. I feel that in the worst case, this article could be tweaked to cover the whole series rather than one/first game, but with WP:THREE reliable sources that cover the subject more than enough... I can't say it's not notable. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have added all 3 sources into the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep changing to keep in view of the reliable sources above which have been added to the article so that deletion is no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.