Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Christian Reformed Church of Toronto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 23:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First Christian Reformed Church of Toronto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only notable for being the first church in its denomination to ordain a woman. WP:ORG#No inherited notability. JFH (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the refs listed on the page, there is some pretty significant coverage: [1], [2], and [3]. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Banner is a denominational publication, so not independent. --JFH (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems to be the leading liberal church in a quarter million member, thousand congregation strong denomination. Not only famous for the first church to ordain a woman, but also to go against the congregation on same sex couples (see the Christianity Today article listed in references). JASpencer (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough independent coverage for me. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The sources seem to show borderline notability. FurrySings (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.