Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firoza Begum (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As Michig noted in his relisting comments, the contributions in favour of deletion were limited in their depth with no reasoning. No more have been forthcoming, while the addition of sources has vastly improved this article. I'm satisfied there's a sufficient consensus to close this albeit concise debate as a keep. KaisaL (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firoza Begum (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable performer. Quis separabit? 02:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose. Source is given, notable enough. Filpro (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non notable performer , Samat lib (talk) 07:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need contributions of a better quality than simply stating notable/not notable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep I added six references to the article and updated. There is not much information about her but she was very famous in India in the 20's and 30s. The most solid one is that she is featured in a 2013 documentary about the most famous Jewish Indian actresses of the time.MB (talk) 05:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as more references have been added to the article enabling WP:BASIC to be passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.