Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Along the Frontier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alastair Sweeny. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Along the Frontier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book, SPA-written to promote Alastair Sweeny, no in-depth coverage found GermanJoe (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Alastair Sweeny: I really couldn't find anything for this book and I searched via Google, an academic database, Highbeam, and Bing. I found this review, but I'm not sure that this magazine would be considered a RS. I also found this, but it's a pretty brief offhand mention. Ultimately this just isn't enough for its own article at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Tokyogirl79's analysis. Remove link from the Alastair Sweeny article as well. PK T(alk) 13:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (or plain delete). It is just an ADVERT. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.