Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire (Kids See Ghosts song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 07:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fire (Kids See Ghosts song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because it has no secondary independent sources. Almost all the sources are album reviews. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 22:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the song has received significant coverage despite a lack of independent sources, having 25 26 that are relevant to it (not including chart positions). The live performance further constitutes notability because it goes into detail about the setting and the song also charted in six countries, which is a good amount and can help with notability when the previous are all true. --K. Peake 06:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Found adequate sourcing to show notability and song was hit in Top 100 popular list in six countries. TheDreamBoat (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Chart performance does not indicate notability alone. Notability should be determined by whether or not the subject has received significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - chart performance does not indicate notability, no awards or honors, not recorded by several notable artists, bands, or groups. Moreover, mostly album reviews support the article, not a single independent source talking only about the song itself. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Kyle Peake's comments above. LOVI33 04:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.