Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final testament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguably this could have (and should have) been speedied under CSD A3. There may be a valid discussion here somewhere, but it should probably be part of the Quran article. Nandesuka (talk) 04:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final testament

Seems to be a WP:OR essay, not contributing to the encyclopedia. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabic bible for the AfD on another article by the same user which is link to in this one. SGGH ^speak! 12:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There do appear to be sources that say this is an established cognomen for the Qur'an. Indeed, the disambiguation page on Testament includes the Qur'an for that reason. I'm inclined towards a redirect if there are no other articles which could also use this title; otherwise, it could be turned into a disambiguation page for the articles. --Sturm 15:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The google book search revealed atleast one other book than the one mentioned below[1]. So we may have a disamb page here. Welt^anschaunng 19:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Final Testament does seem to refer to the Quran according to this book [2]. As for the content of the article, it seems to be telling nothing more than Qur'an. Redirect to Qur'an. Welt^anschaunng 16:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essentially OR. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all OR. It is a well known argument in Islamic thought that the Quran is the final testament. See for example the book referenced above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logifix (talk • contribs) 12:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the article has been modified since the last comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logifix (talk • contribs) 01:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maxim_(talk) 00:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.