Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy Frank (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Looks like you must do a WP:BEFORE search first before nominating anything for deletion. (non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 20:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filthy Frank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated without going through DRV. Delete, salt, and add to title blacklist. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Keep now meets WP:NMUSIC by having a verified chart hit, which is why I reversed my previous deletion per G4. It didn't go to DRV because instructions / policy say "ask the deleting admin first" and just that was done at User talk:Ritchie333#Regarding speedy deletion of Pink Guy. Guidelines are not dogma, use common sense. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now notable due to a Billboard entry, pretty much what User:Ritchie333 said. SilentDan (talk) 18:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & possibly add page protection. I see no notability issues with this article. Arkhaminsanity (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep I understand what Ritchie333 said for the god sake. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 20:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep -Per above. I also kindly ask that the nominator to withdraw the nomination as the subject meets notability guidelines. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 20:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.