Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable educational institute. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Christianity, and India. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- This is a college offering degree level qualifications. Such colleges are typically fairly small, because they do not offer other courses, but that does not make them insignificant. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Question is not if they are significant. Question is if they are notable for wiki policies. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOLS. Given sources are either related or dead. A WP:BEFORE did not give any in-depth sources. The Banner talk 14:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there's a difference between something being "significant" and being "notable." In this case the college might be the former, and that's a pretty strong "might be", but it clearly isn't the later. So there's zero reason to have an article about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.