Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiji–Spain relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji–Spain relations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Most of this article is sourced from the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Most of the relations described occur between European Union not Spain. Level of annual trade is very low at less than €2million. No embassies, agreements, nor state visits. LibStar (talk) 01:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to either Foreign policy or diplomacy. Philosophy2 (talk) 02:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is highly unlikely that this is a notable relationship, though doubtless there are some relations. Nick-D (talk) 08:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 22:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirect as an WP:ATD? Or deletion per nomination?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. No reliable independent sources to be found on this topic. Yilloslime (talk) 04:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nominator's rationale appears to be correct but I'm happy for someone to provide evidence to the contrary. The above suggested redirects do not seem to be useful so I would prefer deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.