Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Domurcuk (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ferhat Domurcuk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last AfD received very less participation and was closed as soft delete. I'd like to have more through discussion on this. It doesn't meet GNG or WP:NACTOR even at this moment. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Turkey. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — I have to echo the UPE concerns again. Most sources are of low quality. I commented on two sources that looked promising at first glance but weren't actually good in the last AfD. Consensus on trwiki says that Haberler (ref 1) isn't reliable, especially about biographies. Ref 2 is reliable, but it's nowhere near significant coverage with three sentences. Ref 3 would be reliable as well, but the content is about him vacationing in Kaş that uses social media posts as reference. The more concerning thing is the bolded message at the very end: "Yasal Uyarı: Bu İçerikten Turkuvaz Medya Sorumlu Değildir", which means "Legal disclaimer: Turkuvaz Medya is not responsible for this content". Then who the fuck is? I'll tell you, this has been sent by the subject (or his manager) to Takvim and they published it in return for some quick bucks. This makes me even more conviced of paid editing going on with the creator, something which they have denied on multiple occasions. From ref 4 onwards the sources are from utter bs publications, not reliable at all, it's mostly "Kimdir?" sources anyway. No significant roles in notable series, no albums from major record labels, no sources. Fails NACTOR, NSINGER and the GNG. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:05, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also agree with the above-mentioned assessment. Oaktree b (talk) 20:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional.--Kadı Message 20:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources are low quality and dont appear reliable. Zeddedm (talk) 08:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources don't appear to be independent of the subject. Pretty much a promotional piece. Keivan.f^Talk 02:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.