Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia Tang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Skomorokh  02:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Felicia Tang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress/model. Fails WP:ENT and WP:PORNBIO, listed movie roles are so minor they don't even make IMDB. No independent sourcing, no indication of any independent coverage satisfying the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - she may have had a bit of fame as the flavour of the moment, but I see no lasting coverage about her. There is this celeb gossip site (warning: lots of lingerie and bikini photos). -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A very attractive, but non-notable woman who fails both WP:ENT and WP:PORNBIO. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.