Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedzai (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. JBW (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedzai

Feedzai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been recreated without satisfying WP:NCORP. References seem to be dead links, press releases, unreliable sources, paid articles. The creator of the article and some contributors may be connected. VV 10:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and California. VV 10:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The nom is incorrect on a number of points. First, the article was not recreated without satisfying WP:NCORP - it was never deleted (the last AfD closed as "No Consensus") but leaving that aside, there are a bunch of references in "Further Reading" which meet NCORP's criteria. Second, *one* of the refs (singular) was a dead link which was due to a parameter included in the URL. As it turns out, the same reference is used again in the article but without the extra parameter and it works fine. I've fixed the bad ref. I agree that a lot of the references within the article that are used to support facts and other information in the body of the article fail NCORP's criteria for establishing notability but the ones in Further Reading meet NCORP:
  • The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Fraud Management, Q1 2016
  • Cool Vendors in Analytics and Business Intelligence, 2011 (Gartner)
  • Market Guide for Online Fraud Detection, 2011 (Gartner)
  • Market Guide for Operational Intelligence Platforms, 2015 (Gartner)
  • Aite Matrix: Leading Fraud & AML Machine Learning Platforms (2021)

There's no doubt that the topic company is notable. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These were the same sources you gave last time, they didn't seem particularly helpful. Does the company have any non-press release stories in the media that discuss it a length? Oaktree b (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agree with nom, GNews is at least four pages of press release type stuff, then it gets into casual mentions of the business. Nothing notable for our purposes here. Oaktree b (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.