Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Favi

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Favi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While trying to promote this individual, the talent manager OVO just makes it all about himself. The sources available are not independent and thus this individual does not meet the general notability guidelines. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nominator. Doesn't pass GNG either also not notable singer. Doesn't have independent sources.DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 23:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Note that draft articles for this singer have already been rejected three times due to attempted promotion (see here), while someone created the mainspace version here anyway. Upon reading the sources, I suggest that young Favi break all ties with his attention-hungry manager OVO. Said manager has gotten announcements about Favi's songs all over the Nigerian gossip media, but those sources are entirely unreliable sites that repeat promo announcements. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Good day Editors, I consider everyone here as unbiased Wikipedia editors I understand Favi was listed on Articles for deletion but the article was not written on any personal connection. In fact, Favi has been featured in multiple news, newspapers, and magazine publications that meet up with Nigerian Wikipedia standards for notability and importance or are we forgetting what WP:NGRS [1] said for Nigerian sources all the citations used were all following Guidelines for Nigerian notability and many of these newspapers featured him because he is among the pioneers of Afro-trap in Nigeria anyone can make research on that. That said I do not see any reason the article should be deleted if it meets up with Wikipedia standards for notability according to WP:NGRS. Regards Digitalageohio (talk) 07:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.