Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fauxtography (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR) per limited participation here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fauxtography

Fauxtography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written as a dictionary entry (Previous successful deletion) Music1201 (talk) 06:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - There's a large archive at Snopes, titled by this term, and for the same reason. The term has been used for years now, and has found it's way into the Urban Dictionary, even though that doesn't exactly qualify it. Plenty of fauxtagraphy gets spread around the internet (especially on Facebook and Twitter, where the dumbest and most gullible people are often found), and it would seem to me that it deserves the name it's been given. Also, it does seem to provide notable information - it's just not fully developed yet, considering it was only created today.

  ^K_Bⁿ_a^o_t^w_t^le_l^d_e^e

  06:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
• Comment - Reading the current page, it seems that Photoshopped images constitutes Fauxtography where in other circles Fauxtography is used to point out fake photographers, usually as a result of them getting a Nikon or Canon camera kit from Costco for Christmas and after some crappy photos think they are they next Ansel Adams or Steve McCurry. Most notable via their use of Photoshop and the inclusion of their copyright/logo plastered on the image itself, the larger the logo the shittier the photo. See http://youarenotaphotographer.com. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 08:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.