Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Nick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Assertions != Producing sources. Waving at google and vague waves that there must be notability are not strong keep arguments. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fat Nick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about non notable so-called rapper made with bunch of unreliable and vanity sources. No decent sources about this person, neither in search nor the article. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 07:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article needs some work but theres an abundance of coverage from hip hop focused publications as well as more mainstream news media such as SF Weekly and Miami New Times. He's also features in the Sound Cloud mini documentary Degenerate Generation. Big on the sizzurp circuit according to reports. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't say there are sources. Bring them and let's see their content. After I removed more YouTube and Wikipedia sources, and now remaining Soundcloud self-published profile, this should have been speedily deleted as a7/g11. But better knock it here, in case it resurfaces. –Ammarpad (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The sources can be seen by clicking the News link above. That's why it's there. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, too many mentions after clicking news for none of them to be RS. Szzuk (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.