Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farihan Alhassan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  ^talk 02:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Farihan Alhassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I considered CSD A7, but I guess being the youngest regional bank manager in Ghana is some sort of WP:SIGNIF claim. Being the head of business banking for a bank (even a major one) is not a notability criterion, and I'm not seeing the depth of sourcing online that would establish a clear GNG pass - I couldn't find anything better than the single source currently in the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I have to agree. Not notable. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 14:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I have added a reference that supports the claim made and will add more information and references.- Din-nani1 (talk) 23:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Din-nani1 the source you added is an announcement by the bank about one of their products, which has a quote by the subject of the article in it - it does nothing other than confirm that he is indeed head of business banking for Stanbic, it doesn't help build a case for notability, which is what we use to decide whether to keep an article. You need multiple sources which are reliable, secondary, independent of the subject, and which cover him in significant depth. If those can be found, I'll withdraw the nomination, but I couldn't fine them when I looked. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 10:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non notable --Devokewater (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Please do not delete. Allow me a day to find other references to support the article. Din-nani1 (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi Din-nani1 - I hope you don't mind, but I've refactored your comments slightly - you're only allowed to !vote once, and we usually say either Keep or Delete (or one of the other options), so I've changed your initial comment above, and unbolded your second request. This discussion will run for at least a week, so you have some time - you can come back and tell us if you're able to find better sourcing. Please note what I said above about the type of sourcing we need - if you can find a couple of sources that tick al the boxes the article will likely be kept, but a load of sources that don't meet the requirements won't help. GirthSummit _(blether) 12:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think this subject is notable enough to be on English Wikipedia. References are from reliable sources. It just needs to be edited.Shahadusadik (talk) 16:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete No effective references. The two that are there are self-generated profile pages. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. No coverage. scope_creep^Talk 19:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL, WP:TOOSOON, and WP:SIGCOV. This is a mid-level banker, on his way up, who has gotten some local coverage, but not enough to write an article article about him. Bearian (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no significant coverage in reliable sources. --KartikeyaS (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.