Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FanBridge (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FanBridge

FanBridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable private company; significant RS coverage not found. Coverage is routine for tech startups -- TechCrunch, online profile, funding news, etc, as well as speculative headlines, as in: Could this startup...?

The article has been previously deleted following a 2011 AfD. Created in 2016 by Special:Contributions/LandonLCarter with no other contributions outside of this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.