Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family tree of Zhu Shizhen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zhu Shizhen#Family tree. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Family tree of Zhu Shizhen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was redirect to Zhu Shizhen#Family tree, where this could be included, there is not enough in-depth coverage of this family tree to support a standalone article. Would have restored the redirect, but since it was contested, recent discussions at ANI have that no longer being an option. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and China. Shellwood (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per mom unless sufficient sources are found in Chinese to support a stand-alone article. Mccapra (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Really, son? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

our secret is out…Mccapra (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, but I don't think AfD should be use to request redirecting. A talk page discussion would be enough, IMO. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable but there is a very lengthy thread at ANI suggesting otherwise. Mccapra (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.