Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairtex Gym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Because of fewer participants. Although, it's leaning towards keep. Wouldn't object to a renomination if someone were to challenge the mentioned sources. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 08:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fairtex Gym

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP, WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 10:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 02:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Household name, plenty of in-depth coverage e.g. Positioning Magazine, Manager Online, TAT Review & Hi-Class Magazine. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can't access any of the articles mentioned by Paul_012, probably because of the security set up on my computer, but the existing article lacks the sources needed to meet WP:GNG. On the other hand, the Fairtex name is well known in Muay Thai circles, so it's quite possible coverage exists. Since I can't comment on the aforementioned sources, I'm not voting right now. Papaursa (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Paul_012. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 09:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.