Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairoz Khan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 10:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's withdrawal comment: The article has now improved a lot after doing some required cleanup. I should have gone for the cleanup instead for nominating for AFD. Kichu🐘 Discuss 13:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fairoz Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any signifact coverage about this politician. The subject has not been elected as a member in any legislative bodies and fails WP:GNG. The sources provided are mainly covering about the events or activities in which this person was involved with. I also doubt that the article has been written for promotional purpose on going throug the artcle in whole. Also please have a look at this edit by the creator and major contributor of this artcle [1]. I have a detalied look on this articles edit history and found these edits by another major contributor.[2] [3] [4] So its clear that this article is completely written for promotional purpose. Regards Kichu🐘 Discuss 09:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 09:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 09:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Discuss 09:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable student leader.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I accept the article is not perfect, but I have found plenty of references for it, and could quite easily find more on google. The subject is clearly notable as the national president of the student wing of the Indian National Congress.— TheWikiholic (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I had plenty of time before nominating this for AFD. So these are m findings. There may be plenty of references. But none of them is actually covering about the subject in depth. They are mainly about something just some other events and there is only mere mentioning about this person. Also being the president of a students wing of a party does not make some someone inherenty notable. And the article is clearly written for proomotional purpose. Kichu🐘 Discuss 19:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL as a student-politician. The coverage is not in-depth or significant enough to merit a WP:GNG pass. Best, GPL93 (talk) 02:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable as head of a national organisation representing 20 million people, subject of major sexual harassment scandal inside the INC, connected to the MeToo movement in India, multi-year coverage in RS. Passes NPOL and GNG...and consider WP:HEY, I did cleanup in spite of my mantra: AfD is not clean up. --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to withdraw the nomination: Now the article seems fine after necessary clean up. It does not seem promotional amd is written in neutral point of view. Thanks to Goldsztajn. Regards Kichu🐘 Discuss 12:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.