Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FX Empire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FX Empire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable website that hasn't received in-depth coverage in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of coverage from reliable sources Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Existing references are blog-quality trash and PR-blurb directory listings. The extended list of sources was more of the same. Searches return more SEO nonsense and I could find nothing about the company itself that isn't a press release or based on one. Kuru (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete simply because the article has never had very good and solid sources and my searches found none of this here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.