Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FSAstore.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FSAstore.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an online store that doesn't meet our general notability guideline or WP:WEB as it hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. The article seems rather spammy, as well. Them From Space 22:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep as the site appears to meet WP:WEBCRIT. They are covered in Crain's business and and DowJones. If POV is the only problem a re-write would fix that. Blue Riband► 03:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP which is the relevant guideline, also to my reading, fails WP:WEBCRIT. LK (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 04:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While Google News and Highbeam both turn up various press-release articles about the firm and its funding, these just confirm existence; I'm not finding anything that could meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:WEBCRIT notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.