Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FITGIRLCODE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW). NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FITGIRLCODE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It appears to be about a blog, though the article is too vaguely written to make this clear. The only English-language reference does not mention the subject. Maproom (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. ukexpat (talk) 01:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There are lots of non-English hits on a Google News search. Can't tell if they're relevant, though. This article seems to be from the Dutch-language version of Glamour, but the Google Translate version seems to be more of a sponsored challenge for readers than a description of the blog. I gave up after going a few pages deeper and not seeing anything really exciting. Maybe someone should go pester a Dutch editor? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It seems most likely that this site is not yet notable, but the creator of the page is attempting to gain publicity for it in order to make it so. However, that is not what Wikipedia is for. Dwpaul ^Talk 23:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable blog that fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 23:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It also seems (though I am not sure) that the site's founder, Aranka van der Voorden, would more likely pass the notability test, and an article on the person would be a logical place to mention the site she has founded (possibly the target of a redirect from this term). Dwpaul ^Talk 23:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The non-English sources do not appear to be address the subject in detail (based on an admittedly difficult use of Google translate) and therefore the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Deli nk (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in the current references. While I did not look for additional sources, I did check Alexa. This website ranks #278,190 in the world, 13,738 in the Netherlands, and 168,861 in the United States. Visitors are 46% from the Netherlands, 42% from the US, and 12% from other countries. If better (!) references are added to the article, I will be happy to review my position. gidonb (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything better than trivial mentions, so I guess I'll join the pile-on. There are many hits at Glamour.nl, but, as far as I can tell, they are all sponsored content, articles written by the founders of fitgirlcode, or trivial mentions. Maybe a Dutch-speaking editor could do a better job, and if they can find third-party reliable sources, then the the article can be recreated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blog is non-notable and overt promo as is. Jppcap (talk) 13:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.