Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAUX
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per G7 by Orangemike. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 20:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FAUX
- FAUX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. B.Rossow talkcontr 17:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - de-facto advertisement for an indie film currently in production (maybe). Obviously fails tests of notability, verifiability, and the ol' WP:CRYSTAL test. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm the author of this article...I work for the director, and I now see that this doesn't meet your criteria. Sorry to clog you guys up! I'll try again when it's had a release!Kafkacafe (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.