Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. Gregory Holland

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar  13:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F. Gregory Holland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography with no indication of notability per WP:MUSICBIO, and no substantial coverage online from WP:RS, just passing mentions on niche blogs and self-published lists of his recordings on Discogs, CDbaby, etc. Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
* Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The article stresses that the subject is listed on AllAboutJazz; however, one usually has to be careful in using that site whether as a reference or in an AfD discussion, as it includes both bylined reviews and user submitted content. There is a past discussion on this in the Wikiproject Jazz archive. AllyD (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The most substantial reference in this WP:SPA article submitted by User:Greg's wiki is probably the brief review of his new album on "Smooth Jazz Daily", but it falls short as a reliable source as a non-bylined review on a blog which itself has no evidence of notability. Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google, Allaboutjazz, Allmusic) are not turning up evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per AllyD. Looks like an extensive discography, but they all appear to be self-released (either via eponymous label, or CD Baby). I wouldn't rule out an artist's article based on self-released albums (see also: Sun Ra), if the recordings had been reviewed in a notable medium and/or by a notable reviewer. But as AllyD pointed out, that doesn't seem to be the case. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.