Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Evolutionary economics#Journals. SarahStierch (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article accepted from AfC for non0notable journal . The journal, according to itself, is not in JCR or SSCI because of its low citation rate. (See section 2 on this page on its cite . According to Google Scholar, its 3 most cited articles have received 88, 79, and 68 citations.

The article contains, contrary to practice,a list of articles published, repetitive statements of its academic stance, and uses its Wikipedia article as a reference on its own web site. DGG ( talk ) 18:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Evolutionary economics#Journals. The journal is indexed at ZBW, but I don't know if this is considered selective. While the journal exists and has an ISSN number, I could find no other evidence of selective indexing. If we had an article on the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, that would be a natural merge target, but no such luck. The journal's existence is verifiable, however and it is already mentioned in the journals section of our Evolutionary economics article, so a redirect to that section may be the best option. --Mark viking (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Evolutionary economics#Journals per Gene93k. I am the editor who accepted this article, but looking at it now it doesn't seem to meet WP:NJOURNAL. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.